Saturday, May 29, 2010
Review : Prince of Persia - Sands of Time (2010)
From the producer of 'Pirates of Caribbean' and the director of 'Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire' comes a true roller coaster ride, 'POP: Sands of time' scores high on the entertainment quota but fails big time on the logic and the much expected CGI areas.
Jake Gyllenhaal plays 'Dastan', character etched out of the video game series by just giving it a name. Well, Dastan is an orphan who is adopted by the king of persia seeing his brave acts. The story goes like this, Dastan and his two foster brothers decide to invade the holy city of Alimut on the say of Nizam (Ben Kingsley) which is against the king's wishes. But Dastan goes on to find Nizam's secret interests during his pursuit of the city and there starts the twists and turns and some high action adrenaline here and there.
Dastan goes on to meet Princess Tamina (Gemma Arterton) who rules the holy city and they join hands to save the kingdom.
Everyone seems to accept the fact that has been going around in the ears of persia that Princess Tamina is the most beautiful ruler ever. (But i seriously don't accept it at all! )
The main weapon that everyone is after in this movie is the dagger. Whoever releases the sand turns back time and that person can do whatever he/she wants. The logic for all this can be exempted but there are a few places where no one would attempt to digest.
For example, the usage of the word 'entrepreneur' by Alfred Molina (The famous Doc-Oc from Spiderman 2), I seriously doubt such words were used in those times.
Even after digesting the fact that people in persia could speak fluent english, one definitely cannot digest the dialogues they spoke which consisted of advanced english verbose.
The CGI fails to raise the 'oohs! and aaws!' as one would have expected fresh after seeing the trailers. Given the money, i think they could definitely have worked more on that.
The music by Harry Gregson-Williams reminds us of the inevitable 'Pirates of Caribbean' in a lot of places but he does deserve credit for other pieces which seemed original.
Cinematography by John Seale was brilliant although there were a few scenes which were shown particularly for showing his presence as a crew member.
The Stunts were breathtaking and the recent trend of movies banking on parkour stunts might prove to be entertaining for a while but that will need some innovation in the near future too.
The Screenplay was slick at places and pretty awkward and illogical at many other places.
The Plot cannot be criticized because its video game adaptation and leaves much less scope for innovation but the producer and director should be lauded for bringing out a decent summer entertainer.
A viewer can completely enjoy the movie if he/she totally forgets the logic part.
The main negative of the movie comes in bad CGI in a lot of places (brought the memories of S.S.Rajamouli's Magadheera) and extremely wonderful CGI in a lot other places.
On the whole the movie is a mixture of both positives and negatives and though the percentage of the latter is more, the movie leaves a 'feel-good' impression at the end.
Rating: 3/5
POP: Sands of time - Entertaining!
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Review: Kites (2010)
'Kites' - the much hyped movie finally hits the screens after a lot of string stretching. Does it fly high in the air making astonishing moves in the sky? Is it worth watching?
Read on to find out!
The movie starts off with 2 kites flying in the air with Jai (Hrithik) narrating with his comical hindi accent as to how he reached his present 'beggar-like' situation. And then the usual, the camera shifts back and forth from past to present and vice versa.
SPOILER:
The Story is basically about Jai who takes salsa classes in Vegas and marries different different girls on the say of his friend for green card purposes and earns a lot from it. One day, Gina (Kangana Ranaut), his student, expresses her love towards him and Jai refuses at first. But after seeing that Gina is the daughter of a rich casino owner Bob (Kabir Bedi), he quickly falls in love with Gina (though just for the sake of money). And, after the usual interactions of Jai with Gina's family brings out Natasha (Barbara Mori) who is Tony's fiance. Then, its love at first sight for Jai-Natasha and they elope...
Such is the story of this film. Would you dare watching it? I mean when you have such a huge budget, better make a decent film and give the rest of the money to charity rather than spending it on useless stunts and candy floss.
Kangana Ranaut is at her devilish and slutty best whereas Barbara Mori who promised a lot for the 'youth' from the trailers looks stunning and hot but is no way near to the perfect 'diva' yet.
Hrithik Roshan is absolutely scintillating, he is the person to watch this movie for and nothing else. The man definitely has got both style and substance.
Rajesh Roshan's background score is awesome and songs are pretty decent enough except for few background score reminiscences here and there of 'Kaho na Pyaar Hai' and 'Koi Mil Gaya'.
Editing is slick but doesn't seem to raise any 'Ooh!s and Aaw!s'. Screenplay is the usual 'copied from Hollywood' style.
Story - I don't think i have to comment on this anymore. The chase scenes are pretty bad for this big budget and there are timely references to flicks such as 'Bunty aur Babli', 'Catch me if you can' and the usual Hide and seek films.
Anurag Basu's 'Life in a Metro' was a brilliant flick after which he made it to the list of promising directors of Bollywood. But his Kites is definitely a 'Kati Patang' in his career.
Rakesh Roshan - Man, if you do have so much money, please give it to me, there are many other people who are in dire need of it.
On the whole, Kites doesn't even make an attempt to fly 2ft high in the air and is a big miss well away from the target.
'KITES' - A big mistake!
Rating: 1.5/5
Continuing the bollywood trend of 'sick' movies in recent times is Anurag Basu's 'Kites', lets see if Mani Ratnam's 'Raavan' clears the air.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)